Re: standbycheck was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: standbycheck was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby
Date
Msg-id 1272809713.4161.31566.camel@ebony
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: standbycheck was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby  (Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 09:05 -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:

> maybe we should be using the tables that exists in the regression
> database or adding hs_setup_primary in installcheck to prepare the
> regression database to run standbycheck in the standby server

This can definitely use some improvement though not yet.

I've documented what's there a little better and fixed up the test
results.

Thanks for your input in this area.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make CheckRequiredParameterValues() depend upon correct
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_migrator to /contrib in a later 9.0 beta