On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 18:40 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> It's error-prone to control what happens in the standby from the master.
> That's the "action at a distance" effect I mentioned earlier. The master
> should be configured in the master, and each standby should configured
> in the standby.
Repeating the same thing when its been refuted doesn't help. What you
say has not been proposed.
If there is a case for HS-off-by-default, make it. If you want to change
code, arguing directly against your own position, mentioned many times,
we need a reason. How else can we know which argument of yours to
believe?
-- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
