Supposing a 50% performance increase disk-by-disk with 15.000rpm vs 10.000rpm you would get better performance (100%) by doubling number of disks versus using 15K rpm disk (50%).
However, you have to check other parameters, for example, if your RAID controller can deal with such a high bandwidth or the disk cache size.
Do you have benchmarks about these hard disk models ?
How about using SSD? ;-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Anj Adu <
fotographs@gmail.com>
To:
pgsql-admin@postgresql.orgSubject: [ADMIN] more 10K disks or less 15K disks
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 11:27:26 -0700
I am faced with a hardware choice for a postgres data warehouse
(extremely high volume inserts..over 200 million records a day) with a
total storage of either
12 x 600G disks (15K) (the new Dell Poweredge C server)
or
24 x 600G (10K disks)
ALL direct attached storage.
I am leaning toward the 24 disks as I expect the higher number of
disks to provide overall better performance under high loads
Does anyone have any experience with a mixed 10K / 15K DAS storage
that you can share.
Thank you
Sriram
