Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
Date
Msg-id 1271859163.8305.28038.camel@ebony
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance  (marcin mank <marcin.mank@gmail.com>)
Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 09:51 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >
> > Adding an assertion isn't going to do much because it's unlikely anybody
> > is going to be running for 2^31 transactions with asserts enabled.
> >

> I think the assert is a good idea.  If there's no real problem here,
> the assert won't trip.  It's just a safety precaution.

If you believe that, then I think you should add this to all the other
places in the current server where that assumption is made without
assertion being added. As a safety precaution.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
Next
From: marcin mank
Date:
Subject: Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance