Re: message clarifications - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: message clarifications
Date
Msg-id 1270563116.24910.6160.camel@ebony
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: message clarifications  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: message clarifications  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 09:57 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > On tis, 2010-04-06 at 10:30 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> >> These are all DEBUG messages. Can you explain "marked differently" so I
> >> can do that for you?
> 
> > Then it would be better to convert them to use elog() instead of
> > ereport().
> 
> Or use errmsg_internal instead of errmsg.

I've changed them to elog() before you said this. Would you like me to
change them to errmsg_internal or do you mean "...as an option in the
future"?

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Check compulsory parameters in recovery.conf in standby_mode, per
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: message clarifications