Re: Getting to beta1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Csaba Nagy
Subject Re: Getting to beta1
Date
Msg-id 1268989163.32604.115.camel@pcd12478
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Getting to beta1  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi all,

On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 10:18 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Or, let's put it another way: I've made my opinion clear in the past
> that I think that we ought to ship with a minimal postgresql.conf with
> maybe 15 items in it.  If we are going to continue to ship with
> postgresql.conf "kitchen sick" version, however, it should include
> vacuum_defer_cleanup_age.

But considering that these are samples anyway, what is preventing to
ship 2 versions, one labeled "minimal" and one labeled "full" ?

The minimal one should only contain absolutely must-change items, and
the full version should contain all. As simple as that. I don't think
there's any value in anything in the middle...

Cheers,
Csaba.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL