Re: Final proposal for resolving C-vs-newC issue - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Final proposal for resolving C-vs-newC issue
Date
Msg-id 12683.974687482@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Final proposal for resolving C-vs-newC issue  (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>)
Responses Re: Final proposal for resolving C-vs-newC issue
List pgsql-hackers
Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au> writes:
> At 17:16 19/11/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/utils/fmgr/README

> There is no mention of the handling of toasted values for old C functions.

Did you not read to the end?

: To allow old-style dynamic functions to work safely on toastable datatypes,
: the handler for old-style functions will automatically detoast toastable
: arguments before passing them to the old-style function.  A new-style
: function is expected to take care of toasted arguments by using the
: standard argument access macros defined above.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Philip Warner
Date:
Subject: Re: Final proposal for resolving C-vs-newC issue
Next
From: Don Baccus
Date:
Subject: PG 7.1 pre-beta bug ...