Re: Hot Standby and VACUUM FULL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Hot Standby and VACUUM FULL
Date
Msg-id 1265217011.1729.2407.camel@ebony
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hot Standby and VACUUM FULL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Hot Standby and VACUUM FULL
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 11:50 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:

> I've concluded that that's too large a change to undertake for 9.0

The purpose of this was to make the big changes in 9.0. If we aren't
going to do that it seems like we shouldn't bother at all.

So why not flip back to the easier approach of make something work for
HS only and then do everything you want to do in the next release? The
burst radius of the half-way changes you are proposing seems high in
comparison.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL
Next
From: Alex Hunsaker
Date:
Subject: Re: Add on_trusted_init and on_untrusted_init to plperl UPDATED [PATCH]