Re: Hot Standby and VACUUM FULL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Hot Standby and VACUUM FULL
Date
Msg-id 1265037339.13782.12328.camel@ebony
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hot Standby and VACUUM FULL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Hot Standby and VACUUM FULL
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 10:06 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:

> the assumption that the file is less than one disk block,
> it should be just as atomic as pg_control updates are.

IIRC there were 173 relations affected by this. 4 bytes each we would
have more than 512 bytes.

ISTM you need to treat some of those system relations just as normal
relations rather than give everybody a map entry.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Deadlock in vacuum (check fails)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Hot Standby and VACUUM FULL