Re: Autovacuum on by default? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Autovacuum on by default?
Date
Msg-id 1265.1155862883@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Autovacuum on by default?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Autovacuum on by default?
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> How do you figure that?  The point of logging what's done is so that you
>> can find out what autovac has been doing, not what it's doing right now.

> I don't think the server logs is the place to record history autovacuum
> activity.  I am not saying we might not need that functionality, but not
> in the server logs, and I think others seem to agree.

Um, so what do you think the server log *is* for, if not a historical
activity record?  This position would certainly surprise a lot of people
who use the log that way ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Can I assume there's only one _RETURN rule?
Next
From: Michael Fuhr
Date:
Subject: Re: Can I assume there's only one _RETURN rule?