On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 22:05 +0100, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> hmm makes sense from the HS side - but I think to make a case for a GUC
> it would help a lot to see actual numbers(as in benchmarks) showing how
> much of a hit it is to the master.
Agreed, though my approach to benchmarking was to provide the mechanism
by which it was possible to benchmark. I didn't presume to be able to
cover wide area with benchmarking tests just for this.
-- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
