Re: tab completion for prepared transactions? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: tab completion for prepared transactions?
Date
Msg-id 1264489409.14033.4.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: tab completion for prepared transactions?  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On sön, 2010-01-24 at 21:56 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >> "PREPARE TRANSACTION is not intended for use in applications or in
> >> interactive sessions. It's purpose is to allow an external transaction
> >> manager to perform atomic global transactions across multiple databases
> >> or other transactional resources. Unless you're writing a transaction
> >> manager, you probably shouldn't be using PREPARE TRANSACTION"
> > 
> > I was thinking of adding something in the psql C source code to explain
> > why certain commands are not implemented for tab completion.
> 
> Yeah, that's a good idea too.

Should we remove the completion of COMMIT|ROLLBACK -> PREPARED then?
That's what initially threw me off.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Review: listagg aggregate
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: problem with CVS on pgfoundry