On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 17:04 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > If we have a default (for DO and CREATE FUNCTION), why not hard-wire the
> > default to plpgsql?
>
> I don't see any strong argument for having a default for CREATE
> FUNCTION. The original argument for having a GUC for DO was that
> plpgsql wasn't built in; now that it is, I think a case could
> be made for dropping default_do_language in favor of a hardwired
> default.
I would prefer having the option, but removing it completely does at
least solve the bizarre inconsistency I've highlighted.
-- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
