On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 22:57 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>
> > It would be good if there was a keepalive WAL record with a
> timestamp on it generated every N seconds while in streaming mode.
>
> Yeah, that would help. In streaming replication we could also send
> such timestamp as a separate message, not within WAL.
Is that something you're working on?
Do we need a new record type for that, is there a handy record type to
bounce from?
-- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com