Re: Hot Standby and handling max_standby_delay - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Hot Standby and handling max_standby_delay
Date
Msg-id 1263664298.26654.50515.camel@ebony
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hot Standby and handling max_standby_delay  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 20:50 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:

> That would change the meaning of max_standby_delay. Currently, it's the
> delay between *generating* and applying a WAL record, your proposal
> would change it to mean delay between receiving and applying it. That
> seems a lot less useful to me.

It would be good if there was a keepalive WAL record with a timestamp on
it generated every N seconds while in streaming mode.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Date:
Subject: Re: Streaming replication status
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Hot Standby and handling max_standby_delay