Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: [HACKERS] TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)",) - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: [HACKERS] TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)",)
Date
Msg-id 12634.1130781635@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: [HACKERS] TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: [HACKERS] TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Tree view 
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> If you go for a new state code, rather than a separate
> boolean, does it reduce the size of the patch?

No, and it certainly wouldn't improve my level of confidence in it ...

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: [HACKERS] TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: [HACKERS] TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags