Re: libpq naming on Win64 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: libpq naming on Win64
Date
Msg-id 1262719276.6448.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: libpq naming on Win64  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Responses Re: libpq naming on Win64
List pgsql-hackers
On tis, 2010-01-05 at 16:48 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > I would have thought Microsoft would have a better solution than this
> > for managing 64-bit libraries.  Or am I too optimistic about Redmond's
> > competence?
> 
> They have two separate installation directories for 32 and 64 bit
> packages. With PostgreSQL though, we'll quite possibly be shipping
> both 32 and 64 bit components in the same installer, and thus going
> into the same installation directory.

Can't the installer install things into two separate directories?



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: XML helper functions
Next
From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Get rid of the need for manual maintenance of the initial