Re: psql tab completion for DO blocks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: psql tab completion for DO blocks
Date
Msg-id 1262479371.3542.7.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql tab completion for DO blocks  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: psql tab completion for DO blocks  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On lör, 2010-01-02 at 17:34 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> As for the overhead, these queries are not zero-maintenance.  I still
> think that the usefulness of tab completion here is pretty darn
> minimal,
> since most people are more likely to rely on default_do_language;

We really don't have any data on that, and it doesn't seem all that
likely to me.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: ssize_t vs win64
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: psql tab completion for DO blocks