On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 13:24 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Hmm, looking at the code, I think Simon threw that baby with the
> bathwater when he removed support for starting standby from a shutdown
> checkpoint.
Hmm, I think that code was just for starting points only. It would not
have been executed in normal running of the standby, so it appears the
bug was older than that. Absence of baby now appears inconclusive.
-- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
