Re: Range types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: Range types
Date
Msg-id 1260819721.13414.46.camel@monkey-cat.sm.truviso.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Range types  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Range types  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 14:23 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > We can ask the user to provide a prior() and next() function, and if
> > they aren't provided, we assume it's continuous.
> 
> Well, that still leaves us with the problem that Joe Schmo will file
> a bug when "create function next(float4) returns float4 as
> $$ select $1 + 0.00001 $$" doesn't behave sanely for him.  I'd prefer
> not to leave it to the user to decide whether a type is discrete or
> not.  The traffic on pgsql-bugs is convincing evidence that a very
> large fraction of our user-base doesn't understand that floats are
> inexact :-(

I don't know how we can decide such a thing. Do you have any ideas? 

Perhaps we can compromise and restrict the support functions to C? That
might be a high-enough wall, and of course it would keep non-superusers
from confusing the underlying mechanism.

Regards,Jeff Davis



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Range types
Next
From: Bernd Helmle
Date:
Subject: Re: [patch] executor and slru dtrace probes