On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 10:23 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>
> > @Heikki: Why is error checking in KnownAssignedXidsRemove() #ifdef'd
> out??
>
> It's explained in the comment:
> /* XXX: This can still happen: If a transaction with a subtransaction
> * that haven't been reported yet aborts, and no WAL records have been
> * written using the subxid, the abort record will contain that subxid
> * and we haven't seen it before.
> */
Just realised that this occurs again because the call to
RecordKnownAssignedTransactionIds() was removed from
xact_commit_abort().
I'm guessing you didn't like the call in that place for some reason,
since I smile while I remember it has been removed twice(!) even though
I put "do not remove" comments on it to describe this corner case.
Not going to put it back a third time.
-- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
