Re: SE-PgSQL patch review - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: SE-PgSQL patch review
Date
Msg-id 1259695626.26322.55.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SE-PgSQL patch review  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: SE-PgSQL patch review  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 20:28 -0800, David Fetter wrote:

> This is totally separate from the really important question of whether
> SE-Linux has a future, and another about whether, if SE-Linux has a
> future, PostgreSQL needs to go there.

Why would we think that it doesn't? Maybe I haven't been following as
much as I should but as I understand it, SE-Linux is pretty much the
defacto policy framework for Linux. Has that changed?

Joshua D. Drake




--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
If the world pushes look it in the eye and GRR. Then push back harder. - Salamander

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [CORE] EOL for 7.4?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: enable-thread-safety defaults?