Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby
Date
Msg-id 1258311475.14054.2422.camel@ebony
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 20:30 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:

> The LSN doesn't help there, because when an itemid is marked as dead,
> the LSN is not updated.

I was thinking we could update the index block LSN without writing WAL
using the LSN of the heap block that leads to the killed tuple.
Pretending that the block might need flushing won't do much harm. 

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: named parameters in SQL functions
Next
From: Brendan Jurd
Date:
Subject: Re: named parameters in SQL functions