Re: Syntax for partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Syntax for partitioning
Date
Msg-id 1256889780.525.0.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Syntax for partitioning  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Responses Re: Syntax for partitioning
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 15:19 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> I can't help but wonder if the PERIOD type might be better for
> representing a partition range. It would make it easier to express and
> enforce the constraint that no two partition ranges overlap ;)

I can't help but wonder if the period type might better be a generic
container for pairs of scalar, totally-ordered types.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Itagaki Takahiro
Date:
Subject: Re: Syntax for partitioning
Next
From: Itagaki Takahiro
Date:
Subject: CREATE TABLE ... INHERITS (parent INCLUDING xxx)