Re: Rejecting weak passwords - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Rejecting weak passwords
Date
Msg-id 1255953075.19430.31.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rejecting weak passwords  ("Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>)
Responses Re: Rejecting weak passwords
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 09:14 +0200, Albe Laurenz wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Great, added to TODO:
> > 
> >     Allow server-side enforcement of password policies
> >     
> >         Password checks might include password complexity or non-reuse of
> >     passwords. This facility will require the client to send the password to
> >     the server in plain-text, so SSL and 'password' authentication is
> >     necessary to use this features.
> 
> I don't get why you need 'password' authentication for that.
> The point where the password should be checked is not when
> the user uses it to logon, but when he or she changes it.
> 
> So in my opinion that should be:
> This facility will require to send new and changed password to
> the server in plain-text, so it will require SSL, and the use
> of encrypted passwords in CREATE/ALTER ROLE will have to be
> disabled.

Note that this solution will still not satisfy the original checkbox
requirement.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: Application name patch - v2
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Application name patch - v2