Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch
Date
Msg-id 1254952184.16369.40.camel@monkey-cat.sm.truviso.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 23:32 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> It's same as my origin ideas, much better formulated. It is ok for me.

You indicated that there may be some implementation difficulty if the
VARIADIC keyword is required for calling using named notation:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-09/msg01792.php

Do you think it would be reasonable to implement?

Regards,Jeff Davis



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch
Next
From: Brendan Jurd
Date:
Subject: Re: Triggers on columns