On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 22:07 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> In short: while I haven't looked at the patch, I think Peter may be
> steering you in the wrong direction.
>
> In cases where you do have related functions, I suggest having
> SQL-callable V1 functions that absorb their arguments in this
> style, and then have them call a common subroutine that's a plain
> C function.
Yeah, that's what he did. So forget what I said. :-)
