Re: Getting the red out (of the buildfarm) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Getting the red out (of the buildfarm)
Date
Msg-id 1254584327.19413.3.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Getting the red out (of the buildfarm)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Getting the red out (of the buildfarm)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 11:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, there are assorted Windows code pages in which 0x80 *is* supposed
> to map to the Euro sign.  I suspect some confusion somewhere in
> Solaris-land about the definition of LATIN2.  But the main point here
> is that what is coming out, on my machines as well as Zdenek's, is the
> single byte "\200" not the "\\u0080" representation that the test seems
> to expect.  Where exactly are you expecting the latter string to get
> substituted in?

The way I understand it, the \uxxxx comes from psql, mbprint.c.  So this
may depend on exactly what locale psql, as run by pg_regress, thinks it
is in.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Getting the red out (of the buildfarm)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Getting the red out (of the buildfarm)