Re: Win32 Backend Cash - pre-existing shared memory block is still in use - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Win32 Backend Cash - pre-existing shared memory block is still in use
Date
Msg-id 12542.1282713799@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Win32 Backend Cash - pre-existing shared memory block is still in use  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Win32 Backend Cash - pre-existing shared memory block is still in use
Re: Win32 Backend Cash - pre-existing shared memory block is still in use
List pgsql-general
Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> writes:
> 512M is still REALLY high for a 32 bit postgresql.  Have you tried
> something in the 16Meg range?

Cutting his value for shared_buffers (currently about 800MB) might be
wise too.  I'm not sure what the effectively available address space
for a win32 process is, but if there's any inefficiency in the way
the address space is laid out, those numbers could be enough to be
trouble.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jeremy Palmer
Date:
Subject: Re: Win32 Backend Cash - pre-existing shared memory block is still in use
Next
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Win32 Backend Cash - pre-existing shared memory block is still in use