Re: Rejecting weak passwords - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Rejecting weak passwords
Date
Msg-id 1254178785.32237.3.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rejecting weak passwords  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Rejecting weak passwords
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 15:52 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > It takes about 32 hours to brute force all passwords from [a-zA-Z0-9]
> > of up to 8 chars in length.
>
> That would be a reason to limit the number of failed connection attempts
> from a single source, then, rather than a reason to change the hash
> function.
>
> Hmmm, that would be a useful, easy (I think) security feature: add a GUC
> for failed_logins_allowed.

Why a GUC, can't we just use ALTER ROLE (or ALTER DATABASE)?

Joshua D. Drake


--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
If the world pushes look it in the eye and GRR. Then push back harder. - Salamander

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings