On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 11:50 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> This is maybe too strict. I thing, so safe version is allow variadic
> packed parameter with VARIADIC keyword as Jeff proposes.
The combination of variadic parameters and named call notation is
somewhat strange, on second thought. Can you identify a use case?
If not, then it should probably be blocked in this version of the patch.
Even if it makes sense from a syntax standpoint, it might be confusing
to users.
Robert, did you have a specific concern in mind? Do you see a behavior
there that we might want to change in the future?
Regards,Jeff Davis
