On Sat, 2009-09-26 at 00:18 +0300, Marko Kreen wrote:
> On 9/26/09, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Maybe it doesn't "need" to know, but I think it would be disastrous from
> > a maintenance standpoint to not keep the two sets of flex rules in
> > strict correspondence. It would soon become unclear whether or how to
> > apply changes in the backend lexer to psql.
>
> Patch attached.
That patch results in the following message from flex:
psqlscan.l:1039: warning, -s option given but default rule can be
matched
