Re: JDBC 4 support - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc
From | Steve Ebersole |
---|---|
Subject | Re: JDBC 4 support |
Date | |
Msg-id | 1253894198.17879.84.camel@localhost.localdomain Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: JDBC 4 support (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>) |
Responses |
Re: JDBC 4 support
|
List | pgsql-jdbc |
Internally Hibernate needs very little. I'd like to take advantage of Connection#createBlob, Connection#createClob and Connection#createNClob (we do not really offer built in support for the new SQLXML type, so we wont be binding to Connection#createSQLXML(), etc, though of course users might want to as an extension). I'd like to be able to leverage the new exception hierarchy. For everything else, its really just a curiosity about what the user can reasonably expect in terms of portability. On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 11:37 -0400, Dave Cramer wrote: > So what functionality of JDBC4 do you need/want for hibernate ? > > Dave > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Steve Ebersole <steve@hibernate.org> > wrote: > Thanks for the reply. Its more of a general question. > > I am looking at adding JDBC4 (JDK1.6) support to Hibernate. > So the > question came up about whether to drop JDBC3 support or > whether to > support both JDBC3 and JDBC4 simultaneously. Moving to JDBC4 > exclusively is largely a function of how well we thought > JDBC4/JDK1.6 is > supported both in the various environments as well by the > various JDBC > drivers. > > Sun's JDK 1.5 is nearing the end of its EOL transition and set > to reach > ESOL Oct 31. So in the ideal world (since the release I am > targeting > here is November) we would simply drop support for it... > > > On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 10:07 -0400, Kris Jurka wrote: > > > > On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Steve Ebersole wrote: > > > > > The download page[1] still lists JDBC 4 support as > "limited" saying that > > > "the majority of new methods are stubbed out". Is that > really still the > > > case? How far off is complete JDBC 4 support? > > > > > > > Tough to say without going through each JDBC 4 feature. The > note you > > mention is certainly old, but there are still significant > JDBC4 > > requirements that haven't been implemented (Wrapper support, > specific > > exceptions, ...). > > > > Is there anything in particular that you're interested in? > > > > Kris Jurka > -- > > Steve Ebersole <steve@hibernate.org> > Hibernate.org > > > -- > > > Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc > > -- Steve Ebersole <steve@hibernate.org> Hibernate.org
pgsql-jdbc by date: