Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling
Date
Msg-id 12535.1297644408@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Responses Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
> I sure would like it if the install script with no version in it corresponded to the latest version. Otherwise, one
mustrename the file every time one does a release. And as you're noting, you lose Git history that way.
 

(1) git does know it's a rename, it's just not default for git diff to
show it that way.

(2) I think that the normal use-case would not involve removing the old
file, so this is moot anyhow.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling
Next
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling