Re: operator exclusion constraints [was: generalized index constraints] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: operator exclusion constraints [was: generalized index constraints]
Date
Msg-id 1253467175.6983.33.camel@jdavis
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: operator exclusion constraints [was: generalized index constraints]  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: operator exclusion constraints [was: generalized index constraints]
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 13:13 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> You're right, it still seems remarkably marginal.  I'm rethinking
> my position on use of CONSTRAINT syntax because of the deferrability
> issue, but I'm still unconvinced that we need to allow the constraints
> to be decoupled from the indexes.

Ok, should I explicitly disallow multiple constraints on one index then?

Regards,Jeff Davis



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: generalized index constraints
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: operator exclusion constraints [was: generalized index constraints]