On Sat, 2009-09-19 at 23:15 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I was wondering if we couldn't introduce a dummy tuple name similar to
> OLD and NEW, called, say, OTHER. Then instead of writing a =, you
> could write a = OTHER.a ... or perhaps a = OTHER.b ... although that
> might also open the door to more things than you want to support at
> this point.
Interesting idea. At this point though, there is enough disagreement
over the language that I just want to take the least-invasive route that
has the lowest chance of causing a problem. It looks like ALTER INDEX
might be the path of least resistance.
Regards,Jeff Davis
