Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Can't we just move the test to run without parallelism? Its quite quick, so I don't it'd have noticeable consequences
timewise.
That just leaves the door open for somebody to add more tests parallel to
it in future.
TBH, I think we could have done without this test altogether; but if we're
going to have it, a minimum expectation is that it not be hazardous to
other tests around it.
regards, tom lane
