Re: Why does LOG have higher priority than ERROR and WARNING? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Why does LOG have higher priority than ERROR and WARNING?
Date
Msg-id 1252907849.30236.2.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why does LOG have higher priority than ERROR and WARNING?  (Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 09:16 +0900, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
> Another matter is that we use LOG level both cases of important
> activity logging and mere performance or query logging. Maybe
> we should have used another log level (PERFORMANCE?) for the
> latter case, and its priority is less than WARNINGs and LOGs.

Ideally, LOG messages are messages that you explicitly requested using
various log_* parameters.  If you need more control, we could
conceivably add more of those.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Next
From: KaiGai Kohei
Date:
Subject: [PATCH] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2311)