On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 07:44 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On ons, 2009-09-02 at 12:52 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Isn't "core" supposed to be the release manager?
>
> The core team has historically been the release *maker* and has some
> done management of the final phases of that process. But I think the
> sentiment is growing that we need more management throughout the entire
> release cycle.
O.k. so a "release" team. Cool. I am assuming the team would be more
directed toward upcoming major release versus minor releases to past
revisions. We already pretty much have that under control between -core
and -packagers. Yes?
Joshua D. Drake
>
>
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
