Re: matview niceties: pick any two of these three - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: matview niceties: pick any two of these three
Date
Msg-id 12516.1367630380@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: matview niceties: pick any two of these three  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>)
Responses Re: matview niceties: pick any two of these three  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: matview niceties: pick any two of these three  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com> writes:
> What do you see that I'm missing?

TBH, if I had 20-20 foresight, we'd not be having this discussion:
either I could see that you're right and this patch isn't going to
cause us enormous pain, or I could put my finger on exactly where
and why it's going to hurt us.  But I can't do the latter today.
Nonetheless, this patch terrifies me.  It's ugly, it's a serious
layering violation, and it flies in the face of very-long-standing
assumptions about the semantics of heap storage.  My gut tells me
that we *will* regret shipping things this way.  Nor am I impressed
with the amount of functionality we're gaining by taking such a risk.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: corrupt pages detected by enabling checksums
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Remaining beta blockers