Re: [Skytools-users] WAL Shipping + checkpoint - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: [Skytools-users] WAL Shipping + checkpoint
Date
Msg-id 1251472425.4839.1388.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Skytools-users] WAL Shipping + checkpoint  (Martin Pihlak <martin.pihlak@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [Skytools-users] WAL Shipping + checkpoint  (Sébastien Lardière <slardiere@hi-media.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 17:55 +0300, Martin Pihlak wrote:

> This is weird, indeed it seems that for some reason the recovery restartpoints
> are not created.
>
> Looking quickly at RecoveryRestartPoint() in xlog.c, there are two cases when it
> doesn't do a checkpoint. For one thing, it checks if if enough time has elapsed
> since last controlfile modification. If not, the checkpoint is skipped. I'm wondering
> if it does the correct thing if the clocks of two machines are too far apart.

Probably not that.

> Another check is "is it safe to do a checkpoint". This is logged with DEBUG2, so
> it should be visible if you set the logging level accordingly.

This seems like the most likely cause. I would guess that one of your
GiST indexes has a corruption in it and is preventing a restartpoint
from taking place. That has happened previously.

> Alternatively, you could attach a debugger to the recovery process and see if the
> RecoveryRestartPoint() and CheckPointGuts() functions are called at all.

I would say no need for that, but you can check the Gist pending actions
table.

--
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Martin Pihlak
Date:
Subject: Re: [Skytools-users] WAL Shipping + checkpoint
Next
From: Martin Gainty
Date:
Subject: Re: Anybody know where to find Dan Langille?