Re: [GENERAL] trouble with pg_upgrade 9.0 -> 9.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Groshev Andrey
Subject Re: [GENERAL] trouble with pg_upgrade 9.0 -> 9.1
Date
Msg-id 1249251355808480@web17d.yandex.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] trouble with pg_upgrade 9.0 -> 9.1  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] trouble with pg_upgrade 9.0 -> 9.1  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

18.12.2012, 05:22, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce@momjian.us>:
> This is the first pg_upgrade mismatch report we have gotten about 9.1.
> I have asked the reporter for details.
>
> Is what is the full 9.1 version number?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

>>  # rpm -qa |grep postgres
>>  postgresql90-devel-9.0.11-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64
>>  postgresql91-9.1.7-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64
>>  postgresql90-9.0.11-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64
>>  postgresql90-server-9.0.11-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64
>>  postgresql91-libs-9.1.7-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64
>>  postgresql91-server-9.1.7-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64
>>  postgresql91-devel-9.1.7-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64
>>  postgresql90-libs-9.0.11-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64
>>  postgresql90-contrib-9.0.11-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64
>>  postgresql91-contrib-9.1.7-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64
>>

Full version ? It is not full postgresql91-9.1.7-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64 or I do not understand something?
I installed latest postgresql from the repository http://yum.pgrpms.org




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Switching timeline over streaming replication
Next
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Slow query: bitmap scan troubles