Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters tocontrol freezing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters tocontrol freezing
Date
Msg-id 12490.1162763083@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters tocontrol freezing  ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 14:47 -0500, Gregory Stark wrote:
>> That way it's unambiguous which is which. Ie, that it's minimum and maximum
>> age and not minimum and maximum transaction id which would be the other way
>> around.

> Sounds logical. Hadn't seen that you could take it both ways.

Agreed --- I've adopted Greg's suggestion.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters tocontrol freezing
Next
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Writing WAL for relcache invalidation:pg_internal.init