Re: [BUGS] BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [BUGS] BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max
Date
Msg-id 12477.1401805486@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [BUGS] BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> I didn't reall look at the patch, but it very much looks to me like that
> query result could use the \a\t treatment that rules.sql and
> sanity_check.sql got. It's hard to see the actual difference
> before/after the patch.
> I'll patch that now, to reduce the likelihood of changes there causing
> conflicts for more people.

Personally, I would wonder why the regression tests contain such a query
in the first place.  It seems like nothing but a major maintenance PITA.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: pg_basebackup failed to back up large file
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max