Re: possible bug on age() function (8.2.4 , 8.3.6) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Philippe Amelant
Subject Re: possible bug on age() function (8.2.4 , 8.3.6)
Date
Msg-id 1245829020.6161.33.camel@philippe-desktop
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: possible bug on age() function (8.2.4 , 8.3.6)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Ok but if I work with hours or whatever the problem is still there

SELECT (EXTRACT(EPOCH FROM TIMESTAMP  '2009-06-23 18:36:05.064066+02') -
EXTRACT(EPOCH FROM TIMESTAMP '"2009-05-12 18:36:05.064066+02"'))/3600,
EXTRACT(EPOCH FROM interval '1008 hours')/3600, age('2009-06-23
18:36:05.064066+02' ,'"2009-05-12 18:36:05.064066+02"') > interval '1007
hours';

The third test should be true and not false


Le mardi 23 juin 2009 à 13:43 -0400, Tom Lane a écrit :
> "Philippe Amelant" <pamelant@companeo.com> writes:
> > Can I workaround this ?
>
> Don't assume that "1 month" means a constant number of seconds.
>
>             regards, tom lane
>


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: question about frequency of updates/reads
Next
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: Replication