On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 09:53 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 12:47 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Well, pgbench has been coded this way since forever and we've only seen
> > this one report of trouble. Still, I can't object very hard to renaming
> > the tables to pgbench_accounts etc --- it's a trivial change and the
> > only thing it could break is custom pgbench scenarios that rely on the
> > default scenario's tables, which there are probably not many of.
> >
> > So do we have consensus on dropping the "SET search_path" and renaming
> > the tables?
>
> +1 (I hate prefixed table names but I get the idea)
+1, sorry JD.
-- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support