Re: Buildfarm alarms - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Buildfarm alarms
Date
Msg-id 1241.24.211.165.134.1159063968.squirrel@www.dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Buildfarm alarms  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
Responses Re: Buildfarm alarms  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Buildfarm alarms  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
Dave Page wrote:
>
> I'm just investigating a problem with beta 1 running on Windows 2K and
> XP, and noticed that neither Snake or Bandicoot have built -HEAD for
> nearly 3 weeks. I'm investigating why and will fix the problem, but it
> strikes me that what would be useful is an alarm email from the server
> to note that a run hasn't been reported for a while would have helped
> spot this earlier. This could be configured with an admin-specified
> maximum number of days between reports to allow for those machines that
> connect far less frequently.
>
> Does that sound feasible to you?
>
>


It could certainly be done. In general, I have generally taken the view
that owners have the responsibility for monitoring their own machines.
I'll think about it some more.

cheers

andrew



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.2beta1 Now Available
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.2beta1 Now Available