Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again
Date
Msg-id 1240429995.2119.102.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 15:49 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> Warning about very old prepared transactions is something that we
> could think about doing as well; it doesn't have to be either-or.
> I think the need for it would decrease quite a bit if they weren't
> enabled by default, though.
> 
> Comments?  Anyone seriously opposed to making the default be zero?

I am not opposed to making the default zero. I am also +1 on adding the
warnings.

Joshua D. Drake

> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 
-- 
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake@jabber.postgresql.org  Consulting, Development, Support, Training  503-667-4564 -
http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: The last WAL segment of the old timeline is not archived for a while after archive recovery
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again