Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again
Date
Msg-id 1240426995.26999.117.camel@monkey-cat.sm.truviso.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 21:58 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Does a prepared xact still block vacuum cleanup in HEAD, or has that
> > been fixed since 8.2?
> 
> It still does. A prepared xact is just like a idle-in-transaction 
> backend as far as vacuum is concerned.

I thought idle transactions generally have released all their snapshots
(where possible), thus allowing VACUUM to work. I would think something
similar could work for prepared transactions.

Regards,Jeff Davis



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again