Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert
Date
Msg-id 1239702548.16396.97.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Whole thread Raw
In response to pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert  (alvherre@postgresql.org (Alvaro Herrera))
Responses Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert
Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert
List pgsql-committers
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 00:06 +0000, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Log Message:
> -----------
> pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert the
> previous patch.

I notice that the release notes talk about "parallel restore", yet the
word parallel is not used in the docs anywhere. The section on restoring
a dump makes no mention of this new facility, nor does the perf tips
section.

Also says that the option doesn't work with --single-transaction, so we
should say that you've added in TRUNCATE to make the COPY go faster (or
haven't you? I know we discussed it).

--
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com
 PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support


pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: dpage@pgfoundry.org (Dave Page)
Date:
Subject: pginstaller - pginst: int_aggregate is just an SQL wrapper now.
Next
From: dpage@pgfoundry.org (Dave Page)
Date:
Subject: pginstaller - pginst: Add new contrib modules in PG 8.4